Greenhalgh T, Raftery J, Hanney S, Glover M. Research impact: a narrative review. BMC Med. 2016;14(1):78.
Google Scholar
Bornmann L. What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2013;64(2):217–33.
Google Scholar
Rudd AB. The broader impact of practicing communication through social media: From Twitter to the National Science Foundation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015;137(4):2367.
Google Scholar
Graham ID, Tetroe JM. Implementation of evidence. JBI Evid Implement. 2009;7(3): 157–8.
Reed MS, Bryce R, Machen R. Pathways to policy impact: a new approach for planning and evidencing research impact. Evid Policy. 2018;14(3):431.
Google Scholar
(ESRC) EaSRC. What is impact? 2020 [Available from: www.esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/.
NWO TDRC. Societal impact through knowledge utilisation 2019–2020 [File Name: Leaflet Knowledge Utilisation ]. Available from: https://www.nwo.nl/sites/nwo/files/documents/Leaflet%20Knowledge%20Utilisation%20-%20web.pdf.
Donovan C. The Australian research quality framework: a live experiment in capturing the social, economic, environmental, and cultural returns of publicly funded research. New Dir Eval. 2008;2008(118):47–60.
Google Scholar
Maas K, Liket K. Social impact measurement: Classification of methods. In: Burritt R, Schaltegger S, Bennett M, Pohjola T, Csutora M, editors. Environmental management accounting and supply chain management. Eco-efficiency in industry and science, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht.; 2011. pp. 171–202.
Bornmann L. Scientific revolution in scientometrics: the broadening of impact from citation to societal. In: Sugimoto C, editor. Theories of
informetrics and scholarly communication. De Gruyter; 2016. pp. 347–59.
Rymer L. Measuring the impact of research – the context for metric development. Go8 Backgrounder 23. Group of Eight (NJ1). 2011.
Godin B, Doré C. Measuring the impacts of science: beyond the economic dimension. INRS Urbanisation, Culture et Société HIST Lecture, Helsinki Institute for Science and Technology Studies, Helsinki, Finland ca/PDF/Godin_Dore_Impacts.pdf. 2005.
Thelwall M. Web indicators for research evaluation: a practical guide: Morgan & Claypool Publishers; 2016.
Abma TA, Cook T, Rämgård M, Kleba E, Harris J, Wallerstein N. Social impact of participatory health research: collaborative non-linear processes of knowledge mobilization. Educ Action Res. 2017;25(4):489–505.
Google Scholar
Feizabadi M. Assessing the impact of Iranian’s clinical trials. Tehran: University of Tehran; 2017.
Batooli Z, Nazari M. The features of social research network for facilitating research activities from medical sciences researchers’ perspective. J Payavard Salamat. 2014;8(4):331.
Atapour H. Measuring the social impact of science: methods, indicators and challenges. The second national science assessment and evaluation conference: quality evaluation of science, technology and industry assessment systems. Isfahan: University of Isfahan; January 25–26, 2017.
Martin BR, editor. Assessing the impact of basic research on society and the economy. Rethinking the impact of basic research on society and the economy (WF-EST International Conference, 11 May 2007), Vienna, Austria; 2007.
Asefzadeh S, Fozounkhah S. Knowledge management: the ladder of research utilization. Hormozgan Med J. 2005;9(1):8–16.
Lauronen J-P. The dilemmas and uncertainties in assessing the societal impact of research. Sci Public Policy. 2020;47(2):207–18.
Google Scholar
Huutoniemi K. Interdisciplinarity as academic accountability: prospects for quality control across disciplinary boundaries. Soc Epistemol. 2016;30(2):163–85.
Google Scholar
Nazeri N, A S, M HG, A. N. Developing a model for the social impact of medical research utilization. Kish Island: University of Tehran, Kish International Campus; 2023.
Sadatmoosavi A, Tajedini O, Khasseh AA, Shabani A. A qualitative study of the process of knowledge utilization in the social sciences. Int J Inf Sci Manag. 2021;19(2):109–23.
Daneshvari Nasab A. Qualitative meta-analysis of research on application’s barriers of research findings. The first national science assessment conference, the evaluation of scientific research (issues, tools and methods). Kerman: Shahid Bahonar University; April 24, 2019.
Mahmoudi A, Adib Y. Research workshop aimed at thinking: a way to facilitate the application of research findings. In: National Conference on the Place of Education Research in Iran: challenges and opportunities; Malayer University. 2014.
Kabiri M. Utilization of research findings and their role in research management as an interdisciplinary field. Interdiscip Stud Human. 2009;1(4): 147–68.
Abedi A, Oreizi H, Shavakhi A-R. Meta-analysis of influential factors on application of research increment in Ministry of Education. J Educ Innov. 2005;4(2):109–33.
Diehr G, Gueldenberg S. Knowledge utilisation: an empirical review on processes and factors of knowledge utilisation. Glob Bus Econ Rev. 2017;19(4):401–19.
Google Scholar
Estabrooks CA, Floyd JA, Scott-Findlay S, O’Leary KA, Gushta M. Individual determinants of research utilization: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2003;43(5):506–20.
Google Scholar
Mosadeghrad A, Isfahani P. Facilitators to health policy and management knowledge translation: a scoping review. Payesh (Health Monitor). 2021;20(5):529–48.
Tajadini O, Babolhavaeji F, Sadatmosavi A. What do Iranian humanities experts say about the translation of knowledge? A qualitative study. Library Inf Sci. 2014;17(1):23–43.
Babalhavaeji F, Tajedini O, Nooshinfard F, Hariri N. Composing self-evaluation tools for knowledge translation related to social science researchers. Acad Librarians Inf Res. 2013;47(1):49–64.
Sedighi Z, Majdzadeh S, Nejat S, Fotouhi A, Shahidzadeh A, Gholami Z, et al. Knowledge translation: a model for research utilization. 2008.
Jacobson N, Butterill D, Goering P. Development of a framework for knowledge translation: understanding user context. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8(2):94–9.
Google Scholar
Tajadini O, Azami M, Sadatmosavi A. Is it possible to transform science into a product in the humanities. J Stud Libr Inf Sci. 2016;18(8):67–94.
Karimian Z, Sabaghian Z, Salehsedghpoor B. Examining the obstacles and challenges of research and science production in universities of medical sciences. Iran Higher Educ. 2012;3(4):1–23.
Yazdizadeh B, Majdzadeh SR. A brief review: How can the use of knowledge obtained from research be increased through medical science journals? Iran J Nurs. 2009;61(22):94–5.
Minogue V, Matvienko-Sikar K, Hayes C, Morrissey M, Gorman G, Terres A. The usability and applicability of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks for research in the context of a national health service. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19:1–14.
Google Scholar
Prihodova L, Guerin S, Tunney C, Kernohan WG. Key components of knowledge transfer and exchange in health services research: findings from a systematic scoping review. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(2):313–26.
Google Scholar
Ojagh Z, Jabbari S, Mehdi M, Vesali M, Zare M, Dorostian A. On the essence and necessity of public understanding of science. Iran J Eng Educ. 2013;14(56):117–32.
Akrami F, Bahadoran ZE. Ethical considerations in publishing and applying research results. Faslnamah-i akhlaq-i pizishki-Q J Med Ethics. 2016;10(37):81–9.
Zheng H, Pee L, Zhang D. Societal impact of research: a text mining study of impact types. Scientometrics. 2021;126(9):7397–417.
Google Scholar
Doulani A, Behpour M, Abam Z. Comparison of the social impact of review articles with original research articles in the field of library and information science indexed in WoS. J Scientometr Res. 2022;11(3):384–92.
Google Scholar
Fecher B, Hebing M. How do researchers approach societal impact? PLoS ONE. 2021;16(7):e0254006.
Google Scholar
Smit JP, Hessels LK. The production of scientific and societal value in research evaluation: a review of societal impact assessment methods. Res Eval. 2021;30(3):323–35.
Google Scholar
Mostert SP, Ellenbroek SP, Meijer I, Van Ark G, Klasen EC. Societal output and use of research performed by health research groups. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8:1–10.
Google Scholar
Kah S, Akenroye T. Evaluation of social impact measurement tools and techniques: a systematic review of the literature. Soc Enterp J. 2020;16(4):381–402.
Google Scholar
Pedersen DB, Grønvad JF, Hvidtfeldt R. Methods for mapping the impact of social sciences and humanities – a literature review. Res Eval. 2020;29(1):4–21.
Google Scholar
Corvo L, Pastore L, Manti A, Iannaci D. Mapping social impact assessment models: a literature overview for a future research agenda. Sustainability. 2021;13(9):4750.
Google Scholar
Salahi S, Ghasemi V, Hemati R. Exploring social impact assessment implementation process with an approach based on grounded theory. J Soc Prob Iran. 2018;9(1):143–63.
Jamali HR. Comparison of models and frameworks of medical research impact assessment. 2013.
Backer TE. Knowledge utilization: the third wave. Knowledge. 1991;12(3):225–40.
Google Scholar
Blake SC, Ottoson JM. Knowledge utilization: implications for evaluation. New Dir Eval. 2009;2009(124):21–34.
Google Scholar
Mehrabi E, Mohaghegh N, Hojjatizadeh Y. Knowledge translation: expanding the theoretical foundations of management, transfer, and sharing of knowledge. Tehran: Chapar, Persian Mythology; 2017.
Kuruvilla S, Mays N, Pleasant A, Walt G. Describing the impact of health research: a research impact framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6(1):134.
Google Scholar
Thomas A, Bussières A. Knowledge translation and implementation science in health professions education: time for clarity? Acad Med. 2016;91(12):e20.
Google Scholar
Asefzadeh S. The quality of collaboration among medical research centers, universities, health executives and the community in Iran. Turk J Med Sci. 2005;35(2):115–20.
Adler M, Ziglio E. Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 1996.
Powell C. The Delphi technique: myths and realities. J Adv Nurs. 2003;41(4):376–82.
Google Scholar
Turoff M. The design of a policy Delphi. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 1970;2(2):149–71.
Google Scholar
Turoff M, Linstone HA. The Delphi method – techniques and applications. 2002.
Glenn JC, Gordon TJ. Futures research methodology version 3.0: The Millennium Project; 2009.
Brown CA. The opt-in/opt-out feature in a multi-stage Delphi method study. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2007;10(2):135–44.
Google Scholar
Chanthiran M, Ibrahim AB, Rahman MHA, Mariappan P, Supramaniam J, Ruskova D. Utilize fuzzy Delphi method to design and develop T2IG application for primary schools. J Adv Res Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2023;32(1):378–89.
Google Scholar
Roldan Lopez de Hierro AF, Sánchez M, Puente-Fernández D, Montoya-Juárez R, Roldán C. A fuzzy Delphi consensus methodology based on a fuzzy ranking. Mathematics. 2021;9(18):2323.
Google Scholar
Faizi K, Irandoost M. Delphi: a method for decision-making and futures research. Tehran: Industrial Management Institute (IMI); 2013.
Hosseini Golkar M, Noorihekmat S, Dehnavi R, Poursheikhalli A. Encyclopedia of foresight methods: for researchers in the health field. Kerman: Institute for Futures Studies in Health; 2017.
Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(4):1008–15.
Google Scholar
Neuman WL. Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2000.
Martino JP. Technological forecasting for decisionmaking. the University of Michigan: American Elsevier Publishing Company; 1975.
Loo R. The Delphi method: a powerful tool for strategic management. Polic Int J Police Strat Manag. 2002;25(4):762–9.
Google Scholar
Graham B, Regehr G, Wright JG. Delphi as a method to establish consensus for diagnostic criteria. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(12):1150–6.
Google Scholar
Nazeri N, Shabani A, Hossini Golkar M, Noruzi A. The social impact of the application of medical research with meta-synthesis approach. Health Inf Manag. 2023;20(4):205–13.
Berdie DR, Anderson JF, Niebuhr MA. Questionnaires: design and use. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 1986.
Nasiri P, Hajsalmany A. Statistics in scientometrics and knowledge and information science. Tehran: The Organization for Researching and Composing University Textbook in the Humanities (SAMT), Institute for Research and Development in the Humanities; 2018.
Bameni Moghadam M, Alimohammadi M. Statistics in knowledge and information science (with SPSS). Tehran: Allameh Tabataba’i University Publications; 2020.
Woudenberg F. An evaluation of Delphi. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 1991;40(2):131–50.
Google Scholar
Fish LS, Busby DM. The Delphi method. Res Methods Fam Ther. 1996;469:482.
Rahdary A, Nasr M. Challenges of think tanks in Iran. Manag Dev Process. 2017;30(2):23–54.
Schmidt RC. Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decis Sci. 1997;28(3):763–74.
Google Scholar
Ghasemi H, Adib F, Akhgari M, Azarbayejani MA, Ahmadi Amoli K, Esmaeilian G, et al. A comprehensive guide to research. 19, editor. Tehran: Andisheara; 2022.
Cheng C-H, Lin Y. Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. Eur J Oper Res. 2002;142(1):174–86.
Google Scholar
Mousavi P, Yousefizenouz R, Hasanpoor A. Identifying organizational information security risks using fuzzy Delphi. J Inf Technol Manag. 2015;7(1):163–84.
Dotti NF, Walczyk J. What is the societal impact of university research? A policy-oriented review to map approaches, identify monitoring methods and success factors. Eval Program Plann. 2022;95:102157.
Google Scholar
Parvinia Nasab AM, Vojdani MA, Dehghani A, Keshtkaran Z, Kavosi A. Viewpoints of educational and clinical staff in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences to barriers implementation of evidence-based care. Alborz Univ Med J. 2013;3(1):23–32.
Safari Y, Darabi F, Pourmirza R, Rasoul M, Miri N. Explaining the concept of evidence-based medicine based on the academic and medical experiences of the clinical faculty members: a qualitative study. J Clin Res Paramed Sci. 2015;4(2):85–93.
Yazdizadeh B, Nedjat S, Gholami J, Changizi N, Sh Y, Nasehi M, et al. Utilization of research in health system decision making. Hakim J. 2009;12(2):1–10.
Mairs K, McNeil H, McLeod J, Prorok JC, Stolee P. Online strategies to facilitate health-related knowledge transfer: a systematic search and review. Health Info Libr J. 2013;30(4):261–77.
Google Scholar
Cooper A, Rodway J, Read R. Knowledge mobilization practices of educational researchers across Canada. Can J High Educ. 2018;48(1):1–21.
Google Scholar
Heidari A, Hassanzadeh M. The participation of authorities in the field of promotion of science and satisfaction with their performance: the viewpoint of experts with natural and legal status. Librarians Inf Organ Stud. 2013;23(4):170–94.
Damari B, Oveisi S, Azizkhani N. A model for utilizing social determinants of health approach by faculty members. Koomesh. 2018;20(2):366–74.
Bauer MW, Jensen P. The mobilization of scientists for public engagement. Public Understand Sci. 2011;20(1):3–11.
Google Scholar
Atapour H, Hamdipour A, Akbarzadeh P. Self-assessment of faculty members of Tabriz University toward social impact of their academic researches. Interdiscip Stud Humanit. 2021;13(3):1–32.
Eslami Z, Hakimzadeh R, Saboury AA, Farzad V. Identifying effective factors in the assessment of research productivity of faculty members in the Humanities and Social Sciences (Case Study: University of Tehran). 2021.
Chamakiotis P, Petrakaki D, Panteli N. Social value creation through digital activism in an online health community. Inf Syst J. 2021;31(1):94–119.
Google Scholar
Khan MI, Loh J. Benefits, challenges, and social impact of health care providers’ adoption of social media. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2022;40(6):1631–47.
Google Scholar
Redondo-Sama G, Díez-Palomar J, Campdepadrós R, Morlà-Folch T. Communicative methodology: contributions to social impact assessment in psychological research. Front Psychol. 2020;11:286.
Google Scholar
Jalalzadeh S, Shayanfar A, Ataee F, Jouyban A. Monitoring of Iranian pharmaceutical studies in the last decade: a scientometric study. Med J Tabriz Univ Med Sci. 2025;47(3):298–319.
Khanali J, Malekpour M-R, Kolahi A-A. Assessing the research performance of the Iranian medical academics and universities: a bibliometric analysis. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023;37:31.
Google Scholar
Honarvar B, Sekhavati E, Bagheri lankerani K. From publication to knowledge translation. Tehran: Alborzfarjad Publication; 2020.
link
More Stories
Why we have to continue with animal testing for medical research | Animal experimentation
PanCAN Announces New Grants Providing Urgent Bridge Funding for Pancreatic Cancer Researchers Who Are Facing Delays or Cuts in Federal Funding
Research Matters: Personalizing Pancreatic Cancer Treatment | Newsroom